[Admit One is a series of brief confessions/reactions to finally seeing movies any film nerd should've already seen.]
Harvey’s built up
quite a head of comic steam in my mind over the years that I’ve put off
actually watching it. But I could only really get into it about half way
through, when I accepted that it isn’t exactly the comedy everyone told me it
was. While plotted like a comedy and populated with comic characters, there’s
simply something else going on that isn’t really all that funny, possibly
creepy, a darkness unintended. Maybe I can blame all those Hitchcock and Mann movies
Stewart painted himself black with during the decade after Harvey for retro-informing my take on his character. Or maybe I can
blame the last sixty-plus years of culture moving away from embracing the tipsy,
Thin Man-esque consta-drunk. Or maybe
I can blame Stewart himself for not really playing a drunk at all, but his
usual confident, clear-eyed self, only this time cavorting with, you know, an
invisible, six-foot rabbit – a bizarre incongruence that, for this first time
viewer, sparks an unexpected creepiness. With his head seemingly as level as
ever, watching Stewart watching other people’s reactions to him as he introduces
them to his big imaginary friend, his typical smiling geniality mixed with some
unnamable expectation, is like watching a darkly cruel psychologist probing a
man on the street for his reaction to a friendly slap in the face. I can hear
Stewart’s laconic drawl now, accompanied by his preternaturally charming,
leaned-forward twinkle: “Now, tell me, w-what’ja think of that?”
I admit I’ve broken that rule-number-one of criticism:
analyze in the context of the film’s time. Too late, Stewart’s cumulative
screen persona is too strong. I just can’t believe that the same man who traced
the anatomy of a murder, if you will, or carefully wheedled his way into
vertiginous love with a fake blonde, or accomplished so much over so many
movies with his probing humor, can be so far
behind the other characters that they’re
the ones tip-toeing around his
dementia. This may be the only movie of his that asks that of me. I can only
respond like I do in every other one of his movies: trust he’s doing the right
thing for the right reason…or that he’s going to learn that his way was the
wrong way the whole time.
Or maybe it’s more like this. Most Jimmy Stewart movies are
some kind of balance between the two stammering halves of the brand JIMMY
STEWART: the yearning, sweet-souled, righteous bumpkin who’s everybody’s
earnest best friend, and the taciturn missionary – world-weary – trying to hang
onto a shred of moral decency while screeching at Injustice with that patented
righteous drawl and/or pounce-ready anger-panic – face like a big white knuckle.
I believe we respond to the first because it’s who we want ourselves (or our
nation) to be, and we respond to the second because we know how he feels and we
wish we could airlift him out of the movie before he breaks into too many
pieces. He’s both in most movies to some degree, often traveling the gamut from
one to the other (as in Mr. Smith Goes To
Washington) – and it’s the combo that makes him three-dimensional,
time-proof. But in Harvey, he’s
all-likable-all-the-time, without a single dark quiver from behind the rosy
glasses (a tremendous testament to his high-wire skill), and it finally got to
me – I decided the darker Stewart had to
be there, he was just keeping it so deep beneath his vest...that only I
could see it. He must be putting everyone on – cause Jimmy Stewart’s too smart
to be so delusional!
I guess my boiled-down bottom line is this: what I got from Harvey isn’t “Sweet, lovable Elwood P. Dowd doesn’t realize the trail of confusion his steadfast loyalty to an invisible rabbit is creating behind him, and isn’t that funny!” but instead “Either Elwood P. Dowd is a mischievous prankster lording it silently over all the suckers, or he’s exactly who he presents himself to be, in which case he’s happily chained to his very own Babadook, and isn’t that horrifying.”
I guess my boiled-down bottom line is this: what I got from Harvey isn’t “Sweet, lovable Elwood P. Dowd doesn’t realize the trail of confusion his steadfast loyalty to an invisible rabbit is creating behind him, and isn’t that funny!” but instead “Either Elwood P. Dowd is a mischievous prankster lording it silently over all the suckers, or he’s exactly who he presents himself to be, in which case he’s happily chained to his very own Babadook, and isn’t that horrifying.”
No comments:
Post a Comment