Whiffs of Malick. Strains of Cronenberg. Suggestions of Eternal Sunshine and Close Encounters and Wings of Desire. The movie could almost be called a flip-book of film influences, if it weren’t that the pulse of the movie is the earnest, intelligent, ever-curious Shane Carruth, whose mathematic, probing scripts make everything he borrows his own. But for a man as deliberate, level-headed and academically inclined as Carruth, Upstream Color is a strange miscalculation.
It is impressionist cinema, to be fair, and not designed to
be dependent on dialogue or straightforward plot, rather on images strung
together leaning toward meaning.
It’s sometimes successful.
The first ten-minute sequence, in fact, is an engaging exercise in
making meaning out of the mostly-unrelated images and characters, until,
finally, you behold the somber head of the plot emerging from the swollen river
of information. It’s an
exhilarating challenge, to gather up the stray facts running past you, and
cobble them together on the fly – before the next one comes along – and
construct in your own mind what would, in a usual movie, be offered up on a
plastic spoon. But by the final
minutes, the sheer volume of unexplained and half-explained and
unsatisfyingly-explained and should-never-have-been-explained elements had
piled up, LOST-like, and I couldn’t help
thinking the images were as much the product of busy work, and nearly as disposable,
as the paper chains crafted by the drugged victims in the story.
Chief among the less satisfying aspects
of the film is the manner in which the purely symbolic becomes the
hard-grounded fact of our characters’ lives. That the so-called “Sampler” – whose deific pastime seems to
be hanging around the emotionally destroyed among us and gathering up their
pain for the purpose of making music to sell in the CD section – is first
presented as a Wings Of Desire
style entity who can be among people but not seen, until later, together with
his porcine menagerie of transplanted souls, they become flesh and blood,
killable, lovable. Whatever
meaning I may have missed in the shift from one to the other (I probably missed
a lot, as did you) could not have made up for the fact that an hour and half of
moodily fractured emotional invention and surprise pays off in the final shot
of a woman cuddling a pig. Cut to
credits off of that, and I don’t know any other way to feel but had.Upstream Color matches the off-the-cuff, loomingly-eerie and unabashedly egg-headed tone of Primer so closely that it effectively hammer-stakes his claim on the combination. If the Mamet-light delivery of the dialogue, all truncated and revised trippingly in the moment, has you frustrated for its grating affectation, like it did me, then maybe embrace it, like I tried, as just a Carruth stamp – a tick of speech style that is as much his as Whit Stillman’s is his, or Wes Anderson’s is his. If the salad shooter editing style, seemingly with little intent beyond the thrill of a fast-forward stumble through the ids of a desperate couple, has you wanting just a little bit more of a connection to these poor, broken souls, like it did me, then just sit back, because eventually, you can learn the visual language enough to fall into the rhythm of quasi-controlled mental-visual chaos and come out the other side, if not entertained, then at least with a general impression of having been through something meaningful. And if you sense that everything I’m saying sounds like a back-handed compliment, then points for reading between the lines, because I am deeply and exactly disappointed by Upstream Color.
No comments:
Post a Comment